US Immigration Solutions for Entrepreneurs, Professionals, and High-Growth Companies

Reducing Barriers for Entrepreneurs

Moving to the United States to launch operations can be complicated, daunting, and for some a deterrent to pursuing their business ideas.

We love working with entrepreneurs and early stage U.S. businesses. We have done so for decades. We have streamlined the process for obtaining the most common visa types for the trailblazers of the world and we have the proven legal experience in this area to apply the creativity that is needed to help find solutions in an unforgiving immigration landscape for entrepreneurs.

Whether you have a foreign company and you are looking to expand operations into the U.S. market or if you just have a business idea as a sole entrepreneurs, we are well versed in all options, the pros and cons of each, the current adjudication standards, and more to help find and execute on a solution that best matches your needs.

 
Banner3_Big.jpg

Breaking News! The International Entrepreneur Rule is Back,
Providing A Modern Solution for Foreign Founders and Startups

The Biden Administration in May of 2021 clarified support for the 2017 Obama Era Entrepreneur Parole Rule. Read our full breakdown here. With applications now being welcomed by the USCIS, we at ImmiPartner are ready to help guide founder teams and their startups through this process. The high level requirements of this exciting modern approach to immigration for startup founders requires the following key showings, in addition to several nuanced items to be discussed in a legal consultation:

 

1. The Formation of a ‘New’ Start-Up Entity

The regulations define this as a business that has been formed within the 5 years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the initial parole application to the USCIS.

 

2. Evidence that the Applicant is a ‘Qualified Entrepreneur’

To apply as a founder you must show that you are qualified as an ‘Entrepreneur’. This requires showing that you are “well-positioned to advance the entity's business.” Proving this comes down to a showing that as a founder: 

  1. You possess at least a 10% interest in the entity at the time of adjudication of the initial 2.5-year grant of parole (I-941 application), and that you still possesses at least a 5 percent ownership interest in the start-up entity at the time of adjudication of a subsequent period of re-parole (the second allowable period of 2.5 years); and 

  2. You have an ‘active and central’ role in the operations in a manner that you impact the future growth of the entity. This can be shown through specific skills, experiences, knowledge that clearly will help the entity in growing the business in the U.S. More on this here.

As an important note about ownership, the rules, therefore, do take into account that equity stakes may decrease over time and for that reason do allow entrepreneurs to reduce his or her ownership interest in the start-up entity as time goes on. This is one of the examples of how this rule is lightyears ahead of existing non-immigrant visa options such as the E2, L1, O1, and others which are simply not well suited in many cases for startup founders and entrepreneurs. It is however important to keep in mind that at all times the entrepreneur must maintain at least a five (5) percent ownership stake in the entity to abide by the rules. Also, a 5% equity stake must be shown during the application for the second 2.5 year period of parole, also known as the re-parole process. 

 

3. A Substantial Potential for Growth Evidenced through Significant U.S. Capital Investment or Government Funding

This criterion is aimed at trying to verify that a startup indeed has a realistic and reasonable chance of delivering on the goal of substantially benefiting the U.S. through rapid growth and job creation. The rules lay out three different methods by which this can be proven. The first two, specifically detailed milestones, include showing that the startup received, within 18 months immediately preceding the filing of an I-941 application, an investment of $250,000 from qualified investors, or $100,000 through one or more qualified government awards or grants. Then there is a third option by which a founder can show that the startup has partially reached these investment thresholds and also has other reliable evidence of the significant benefit that the U.S. will derive by the startup. More details can be found here but in essence the government would be looking to see the additional social value of the business, the local and national scope of the product or service, the number of users of the product or service, any revenue generation to date, whether there is any other non-parole rule qualifying investment capital, and more.

Please read our in-depth article breaking down the rule, read our FAQs, and watch our video series on the Entrepreneur Parole to get into the nuanced details.

 

Resources for Entrepreneurs

E-2 guide

VIsa Options Guide

 

Australian Spotlight

ImmiParter has been honored to help various Australian entrepreneurs and companies with U.S. Immigration needs. We have also worked closely with Australian organizations seeking ways to help their members gain an understanding of U.S. immigration fundamentals to expand into the U.S. market.


 
 
 

GET STARTED NOW

 
unsplash-image-_afH9fjiom0.jpg

Articles for Entrepreneurs and Startups


 

New Zealand Spotlight

At ImmiPartner we have been lucky enough to help provide immigration guidance and informational guides for many New Zealand companies and entrepreneurs. We aim to aid in providing an understanding of the U.S. immigration landscape and how best to approach satisfying immigration requirements.

 
 
image-asset.jpg